Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- guides:xml_common_guide [2017/11/15 23:03] – administrator
+++ guides:xml_common_guide [2018/11/21 01:09] (current) – brett.zamora
@@ Line 98: / Line 98: @@
 | <color #0000ff>PRIA_DOCUMENT</color> | PACKAGE | R | This is a multi-occurrence node. This same node is included by reference in the REQUEST structure and the RESPONSE structure. This node contains information identifying the type of document, Base64 encoded TIFF data, and on return from a county, it will contain recording and/or reject information. |
 | - | _Code | R | This field contains the text for one of the CeRTNA ERDS or G2G Standard Document Types. Example: “DeedOfTrust”. A list of the current CeRTNA ERDS or G2G Document Types is available by clicking on of these links: [[guides:erds_doc_types|ERDS Document Types]] or [[guides:g2g_doc_types|G2G Document Types]]. |
-| - | DocumentSequenceIdentifier | R | The sequence of this document within the payload. Documents in an XML payload must appear in sequence. A payload that has documents out of sequence will not pass XML validation. |
+| - | DocumentSequence Identifier | R | The sequence of this document within the payload. Documents in an XML payload must appear in sequence. A payload that has documents out of sequence will not pass XML validation. |
 | - | _UniqueIdentifier | O | This attribute has been designated for use by CeRTNA Agents and/or Government Agencies. The CeRTNA ERDS and G2G Direct Entry UI does not use this value. This attribute can be used to store a submitters internal document identifier. If this field is included in the Request transaction, it should also be returned in the Response transaction. |
+| <color #0000ff>RECORDING_ENDORSEMENT</color> | PRIA_DOCUMENT | O | If included in the RESPONSE structure this node will contain recording information. This node should not be included if the specific document has been rejected. This node is not expected to appear REQUEST structures. If this node is included, the child properties are required. |
+| - | _Identifier | P | This attribute is for use by the county and may contain a value that is relevant to their internal application. |
+| - | _OfficersName | P | Name of the examiner that recorded the document. |
+| - | _InstrumentNumber Identifier | P | The recorded document or certificate number. |
+| - | _RecordedDateTime | P | The date/time the document was recorded. |
+| - | _RecordedDateTime | P | The date/time the document was recorded. |
+| <color #0000ff>_FEES</color> | RECORDING_ ENDORSEMENT | P | This is a wrapper for the _RECORDING_FEE node. |
+| <color #0000ff>_RECORDING_FEE</color> | _FEES | P | This XML element is a child of the optional _FEES element. If the _FEES element is included, this child element and its associated attributes are required. The _RECORDING_FEE properties implement a name/value construct. Although the _RECORDING_FEE node is a multi-occurrence node, the CeRTNA implementation is only designed to accept 4 occurrences of this node based on the property detail shown below. |
+| - | RecordingEndorsement FeeDescription | P | The type of fee. Currently there are 4 values supported by CeRTNA for this attribute. “RecordingFee”, “TransferTax”, “CityTax”, and "SB2Fee". Recording software vendors should roll their numbers up, based on which of the fee types are being supplied. |
+| - | RecordingEndorsement FeeAmount | P | The fee amount expressed with a 2 decimal position format. Example: “35.00” Do not use currency format. |
+| <color #0000ff>EMBEDDED_FILE</color> | PRIA_DOCUMENT | R | This node is used to wrap the encoded TIFF document.  |
+| - | _PagesCount | R | The number of pages in the TIFF document. This count is validated against the unencoded TIFF image. |
+| <color #0000ff>DOCUMENT</color> | EMBEDDED_FILE | R | This node holds the Base64 encoded TIFF data. |
+| <color #0000ff>STATUS</color> | PRIA_DOCUMENT | O | By PRIA definition, this node is optional, however, CeRTNA and our submitter community expect this node to be present so that agents can programmatically determine whether the document has been recorded or rejected. If included, the _Code attribute is required and will be either “Recorded” or “Rejected” |
+| - | _Code | P | If the STATUS element is included this attribute is required and it will contain either “Recorded” or “Rejected” |
+| <color #0000ff>RECORDING_ERROR</color> | STATUS | O | This node is only used when a document has been rejected by the county. By PRIA definition, this node is optional, however, if the document has been rejected, CeRTNA and our submitter community expect this node to be present so that agents can programmatically capture the reason that the document was “Rejected”. This node is not used when a document is recorded. |
+| - | _Code | P | This will be a 5 digit number represented as a string that is one of the [[guides:erds-g2g_reject_reasons|CeRTNA Standard Reject Reason codes.]] For example _Code=”00002” |
+| - | _OfficersName | O | Examiners name or id. |
+| - | _Description | O | This is a text description of the reject reason. CeRTNA has standard text for all the codes other than _Code =“99999” which is ‘Free-Form’ reject code. If a county uses the _Code=”99999” reject code, they should provide a maximum 256 character description. The CeRTNA ERDS portal will append any value provided in the _Description field to the default description for the _Code that is supplied. Example, _Code=”00025” _Description=”Beautiful day out today” will result in the CeRTNA displaying a reject reason of “Signature missing. (Beautiful day out today)” Another example, _Code=”99999” _Description=”We are unable to verify your signature.” will result in the CeRTNA displaying a reject reason of “We are unable to verify your signature.”
+ |
+===== Summary =====
+In summary, this page is not intended to imply that the only XML elements that an integrator should plan for are ‘the most common’ but rather, to help integrators understand what elements we are seeing supplied by various submitters today.
+Any element that is part of the CeRTNA Standardized XML structure is valid for supplying data. What submitters and integrators need to keep in mind is that every county is different and the communication that has been supplied to date is that counties prefer to index the documents within their backend applications. This said, the CeRTNA ERDS Portal, passes in a very limited amount of information that a county might use for indexing, such as the Document Type and the Number Of Pages. On the other hand, agent submitters or government agencies might pass in GRANTOR/GRANTEE information too, since they often create XML payloads programmatically.
+Just because GRANTOR/GRANTEE information is supplied, it does not mean a County Integrator must use it. That is a decision for each county and its software vendor. This said, if a submitter supplies GRANTOR/GRANTEE information (as an example), then an integrator should return that data in their Response payload, regardless of whether they use it in their application.
+This document is not intended to dictate policy. A Polices & Procedures Committee is in place for that very function. What this document is intended to do is to provide the best guidance it can with regard to what the individual data elements mean, which ones are required, and which ones we are seeing being used at the time of this writing.